BANKTHINK

Involve Congress in Reconsideration of Basel III

Print
Email
Reprints
Comments (3)
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

It is quite astonishing, really, how little the federal banking regulators have clued Congress in on the whole Basel international capital plan. You would think such a comprehensive set of regulations that will literally transform the entire structure of the U.S. banking industry would benefit from meaningful consultation with the people who make the laws. Unfortunately, the regulators seem to have adopted the same attitude toward Congress and Basel III as they followed with Basel II: This is our business; we know what we're doing. Or so it would appear.

Much to the surprise of everyone other than the regulators involved in drawing them up, the proposed rules would extend to every single bank in the country, regardless of size, charter or business model. What began as an effort to create a one-size-fits-all set of standards for global banks involved in international commerce was converted on this side of the Atlantic into a one-size-fits-all plan for banks in Appleton, Wis., Brewton, Ala., Tyndall, S.D., Jacksonville, Texas and everywhere else that will vote for congressional representatives this November.

As a result, we see Congress almost begging the regulators for information on what the proposed capital plan involves and what the regulators have done to analyze the impact of Basel on the communities where Senators and congressmen and their constituents live. Things like the availability of credit and other financial services to local businesses, the impact of the rules on a struggling housing and mortgage market and the viability of local banks matter to the people who have election certificates.

Not that Congress is eager to set capital rules, or that anyone would ask them to do so. But Congress is legitimately interested in the impact of major regulatory changes, and no financial regulatory proposals in recent memory would be as fundamentally transformative as the Basel capital rules. When the state banking regulators announced on Oct. 3 "we are opposed to the proposed approach put forth by the federal banking agencies to implement the Basel III capital accord," senators and representatives felt comfortable asking "What gives?" 

The calls from the Hill have been delivered to the regulators in various formats. There have been inquiries from individual legislators. One letter signed by 53 senators expressed the worry that the proposals could result in community banks "reducing lending and economic growth in the communities in which they serve."

Several entire state delegations have weighed in, including all 10 members of the Maryland delegation, who wrote, "we strongly encourage you to avoid needless complexity and consider the impact any new framework will have" on the banks, consumers and businesses back home.  Leaders in the House and Senate have expressed their concerns, and public hearings are being contemplated.

The congressional queries carry a common theme. Adequate levels of high quality bank capital are good, but do you need all of these other complex provisions to achieve that? 

At last count well more than a thousand individual, specific comment letters have been filed by the bankers themselves, each describing how the proposals would affect their own bank and their customers. Invited or not, Congress is in on the game now.

As the regulators consider the comments, as they weigh the real-life impact of the Basel proposals on hometown America, it would be well to involve Congress in the reconsideration. 

Few legislators will have much appetite for setting bank capital policy, but it would be a gross error to mistake that discretion for lack of interest in what those policies will do to local economies. 

Wayne A. Abernathy is executive vice president for financial institutions policy and regulatory affairs at the American Bankers Association. Previously he served as assistant secretary of the Treasury for financial institutions and as staff director of the Senate Banking Committee.

 

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(3) Comments

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

'We Don't Want to Wage this Proxy Contest in the Gutter': Week's Best Quotes

The most notable quotes from American Banker stories of the previous week. Readers are encouraged to add their own observations in the Comments fields at the bottom of each slide.

(Image: Fotolia)

Comments (3)
Good Work...really the problem is to get the regulatory bodies to admit that they were wrong and illogical in using Basel III to put more capital pressure and gain more control over small banks and not to prevent any systemic risk as intended by Basel. The systemic risk argument is without any logic or rationale, remembering that the average community bank is 1/10,000 the size of B of A and threatens no one. Congress should be irrate.
Posted by Rhsmith999 | Thursday, November 01 2012 at 12:31PM ET
Involved they are, as they ought to be, already.There are Senate and House Committees on Banking.In 2010, Dodd-Frank Act came from Congress.There have been financial testimony sessions regularly held.No national regulation is complete without care for the global finance and international regulation, all the more that US has been one of the first ten founding members of Basel in 1970s.Interestingly, US has never been among the first to complete implementation of Basel guidelines. In order to improve effectiveness of involvement of Congress in financial regulation, they must regularly seek status report on implementation and impact of international regulation on US economy and its constituents, specially their own constituencies.
Posted by Center for Safe and Sound Banking | Thursday, November 01 2012 at 1:10PM ET
Where were all those community bankers when the "too big to fail crowd" were abusing the country, getting their bonuses, and retiring to luxury? They were silent and their trade lobbies (like ABA, CBA, MBA, etc) were only listening to the big boys. When you fly with the crows, you get shot with the crows!

Even today, few people in banking are looking out for the "folks". Wells Fargo directors have just stated that earning huge profits (1000% ROE) on the backs of the poor is "good". There is no uproar from the smaller banks against abusing customers so why should Congress have any sympathy. Congress will just think it is self-serving whining and is insincere.
Posted by frankarauscher | Thursday, November 01 2012 at 1:12PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.