Quantcast
OCT 15, 2009 4:23pm ET

Web Seminars

Dashboards: How's Business? Ask your Data!
March 15, 2012
The End of the Magstripe?
The State of EMV Smartcards in the U.S.
March 6, 2012
A Lower Risk, Evolutionary Approach to Banking Transformation
March 1, 2012

Got a problem with industry pushback against CFPA? Take it up with your pension fund

Print
Reprints
Email

Tired of hearing warnings that a new consumer financial products agency will hurt your local florist? Eliot Spitzer has a solution. He thinks you should complain to your pension fund or mutual fund about it.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is behind those anti-CFPA ads, which feature doe-eyed butchers, bakers and florists standing in their quaint little shops, braced for the day when the government will swoop in and tell them they can no longer offer store credit to their customers. President Obama has spoken out against the Chamber’s spin, and House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank has said repeatedly that the new consumer protection regulator would not bear down on small businesses. Spitzer, in his latest Slate column today, argues that the Chamber’s lobbying efforts should be curtailed, and that the public can participate in making that happen.

The Chamber is funded by public companies, and public companies’ largest and most vocal shareholders are mutual funds and pension funds, Spitzer says. So if pension- and mutual-fund customers tell their funds to make the Chamber cut back on its lobbying, the whole thing just might happen.

Of the funds, Spitzer says: “They have failed to control the management of the companies they own because the actual owners of those mutual funds and pension funds—you and I—have failed to raise our voices. We haven't even asked questions.”

Spitzer doesn’t really want Joe Schmoe to take the lead on this. The treasurers and comptrollers of public pension funds, who are elected officials, should get the ball rolling. Sounds to BankThink like an arduous process that could take quite a while. But that’s OK! Regulatory reform could take a while too. And it would be nice to get past the fearmongering to some more substantial debate before legislation is enacted.


Comments (10)
I am very enjoyed for this blog. Its an informative topic. It help me very much to solve some problems. Its opportunity are so fantastic and working style so speedy. I think it may be help all of you. Thanks a lot for enjoying this beauty blog with me. I am appreciating it very much! Looking forward to another great blog. Good luck to the author! all the best!.. Rolex Watch
Posted by Thompson2332 f | Thursday, May 19 2011 at 1:00AM ET
The post is written in very a good manner and it entails many useful information for me. I am happy to find your distinguished way of writing the post. Now you make it easy for me to understand and implement the concept. Thank you for the post cheap diabetic supplies
Posted by Shon Y | Wednesday, May 25 2011 at 2:48AM ET
Hello its one of the nice and informative blog regarding the pension and funds.I was not knowing more about it but after reading it I came to know about it.Thanks a lot for sharing this post here. Dental Assistant school
Posted by Anthony G | Wednesday, May 25 2011 at 7:22AM ET
Speaking in an online forum immediately following the president's address, American Enterprise Institute fellow and member of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Peter Wallison predicted that Obama will issue his first veto over the consumer protection measure. Although the House bill creates an independent consumer agency, Wallison said that "there is no chance in the world" the Senate will agree on the same provisions for the CFPA.In light of this basic disagreement, Wallison noted that "the president said that if the financial reform bill reaches his desk and it does not have real reform, that he will send it back," adding, "This is the first time that the president said that he might veto a bill that doesn't have what he has proposed."
Posted by Burton J | Wednesday, June 08 2011 at 3:49AM ET
There are actually two questions at issue. First, why can't existing agencies be tasked with whatever additional regulation is required? After all, Obama himself talked about waste and duplication in government, both last night and repeatedly over the last three years on the national stage. Creating a separate agency to handle financial products like credit default swaps and other less arcane and more commercial products when the SEC already oversees these markets is a recipe for both contradictory overlap and holes in oversight. It's less efficient and builds bureaucratic barriers where streamlined communications would produce better results. frontline plus for dogs
Posted by Burton J | Wednesday, June 08 2011 at 3:53AM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

About BankThink

BankThink is a blog about ideas, trends, and other developments in financial services.

Survey

Facebook's securities filings show its Facebook Credits digital currency business is exploding. Does it pose a serious threat to banks?

12%
32%
56%
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.