BANKTHINK
Barb Rehm

Who's to Blame for Fed's Poor Morale?

Print
Email
Reprints
Comments (4)
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

The Huffington Post had an impressive scoop this week: 56% of the staff working in the Federal Reserve's banking supervision and regulation division don't trust the agency's senior leaders.

But HuffPost pulled its punches by primarily blaming the lousy morale on Alan Greenspan, the Fed chairman who left the building in 2006.

"The shaky morale is a legacy of Alan Greenspan's 19-year term as Fed chairman," the article says. "From 1987 to 2006, the Greenspan Fed pushed for a hands-off approach by regulators, who then found themselves blamed for the financial crisis that led to the most punishing economic downturn since the Great Depression."

(To see more posts from Barb Rehm's Blog,click here.)

The more likely villain here is Fed Gov. Dan Tarullo, whose been drivingfinancial services policy at the central bank since early 2009. Sources routinely describe Tarullo as a bully who only listens to opinions that mirror his own.

The long piece it runs more than 4,200 words spotlights the results of a survey the Fed conducted of its banking supervision and regulation employees back in April. It mentions Tarullo, but it feels like the author is uncomfortable laying the blame on someone he sees as dedicated to cracking down on the largest banks.

"Employees said Tarullo has a view of what the financial system should look like, particularly with respect to large financial groups, and is focused on developing policy that closely matches his worldview," HuffPost says. "He can be a bully, people who work with him said, and he relies heavily on the opinions of Mark Van Der Weide and Anna Lee Hewko, employees said."

But the article then goes out of its way to call Tarullo "an ardent champion of policies and rules designed to make the financial system safer and less prone to panics," and notes that he "has emerged as a vigorous defender of banking rules and a proponent of government oversight."

That may be true, but Tarullo has a firm grip on supervision and regulation and the Fed survey revealed that division "is demoralized," and that "teamwork is nonexistent, innovation and creativity are discouraged and employees feel underutilized."

The survey also found that supervision and regulation staff are afraid to speak out and feel isolated.

The Fed's inspector general has launched a probe into complaints lodged by Fed staff, HuffPost reported.

That the Fed even did this survey is remarkable, and sources Thursday referred to the results as "amazing" and "stunning." It seems clear the results were leaked by a Fed employee who is fed up.

The question now is whether anything will change.

No one at the Fed was willing to talk about that on Thursday. But until Tarullo leaves, don't expect improvement. While his term runs until 2020, rumors consistently pop up that he's ready to go.

He may not have much choice, depending on whom President Obama nominates as Fed chairman in a few weeks.

If Obama goes with Fed Vice Chair Janet Yellen, most sources expect Tarullo will resign. The two aren't close and Yellen has strong opinions on bank regulation.

If Obama goes with Larry Summers, it's harder to gauge the impact on Tarullo.

Most sources cannot envision Summers giving Tarullo the free rein that Chairman Ben Bernanke has. But some insiders think Tarullo is pulling for Summers because he thinks it would mean he could keep his tight grip on bank policy.

Those same sources are rooting for Yellen, mainly because they see the same personality problems they have with Tarullo in Summers.

"We don't need two bulls in the china shop," is how one put it.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(4) Comments

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

Legal Bills Pile Up at Banks
Each quarter banks report their worst-case estimates of costs tied to lawsuits and regulatory probes. Some banks reported lower figures in recent quarters, but others are braced to spend more to resolve legacy issues. New legal threats loom, too.

(Image: Fotolia)

Comments (4)
The FDIC was similarly beset by a strained labor-management problems which were only solved with help from the union, NTEU. The Federal Reserve, although not unionized, can learn from the FDIC's experience and how morale problems were solved only after the NTEU and the American Banker put Chairman Bair on the spot in 2007. The FDIC was subject to numerous complaints and lawsuits stemming from its unfair and prejudicial employee performance, hiring, and rating system.

Independent polls of FDIC employees administered by consultants disclosed that nearly 50 percent of employees did not feel comfortable in reporting to executive management incidents of "wrongdoing" by supervisors. Nearly half of those surveyed also lacked trust in supervisors and had no confidence in the "pay for performance" rating system. Morale was so bad it precipitated a class action lawsuit by the NTEU for discrimination against minorities and employees over 40 years of age. In 2012, after many years of court battles, the class action suit prevailed against the FDIC and cash payouts (for damages) were made to nearly 1,000 employees.

The Federal Reserve would be wise to pay attention to the following letter sent to Chairman Bair by the president of the NTEU. See the following link for more on this issue at the FDIC.

http://govwhistleblower.wordpress.com
Posted by Dwihas3 | Friday, August 30 2013 at 8:53AM ET
Given the Fed's track record with systemic risk management and its current lead role, maybe it needs a bully to get it right next time!
Posted by kvillani | Friday, August 30 2013 at 12:29PM ET

Who's to Blame for Fed's Poor Morale? http://www.americanbanker.com/bankthink/whos-to-blame-for-feds-poor-morale-1061703-1.html ...
Here's why Gov. Tarullo's not been nominated as Fed Vice Chair for Supervision.

CKH
Posted by hurley | Friday, August 30 2013 at 2:17PM ET
The results of this survey as reported in the Huffington Post article are indeed disturbing. They certainly do not reflect my experience as General Counsel to the Board in the early Volcker years when open collaboration and communication among all concerned Divisions of the Board (including the Legal Division), and with Board members, on supervisory matters and policies was the norm and a given-as previous commentator and my former Fed colleague, Con Hurley, would surely confirm.

In light of this survey, perhaps all the media attention to the Summers v Yellen v Kohn v Ferguson et al debate on the Fed Chairman nominee has missed the mark. Dr. Phil may be what the Fed needs!

Neal L. Petersen, Attorney at Law
Posted by petersenesq | Friday, August 30 2013 at 5:24PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.