Quantcast
MAR 24, 2009 1:00am ET

Related Links

Bonus Flap May Keep Investors on Sidelines
MARCH 23, 2009
Investors Seek $4.7 Billion from First Round of Talf
MARCH 20, 2009
With Talf Launch, Fed to Seek New Funding Sources
MARCH 4, 2009
Bigger Talf Forces Fed to Confront its Funding
FEBRUARY 13, 2009

Web Seminars

Small Banks and Dodd-Frank: Ready or Not, Here It Comes
Available On Demand
The Debit Business Overhaul: Interchange, Overdraft, Exclusivity
Available On Demand
Meeting the Challenge: How to Implement Enterprise Risk Management
Available On Demand

TALF Revamp Could Pose New Fed Risks

Print
Reprints
Email

WASHINGTON — With the Federal Reserve Board poised to expand its consumer lending program to accept many of the bad assets held by financial institutions as collateral, the central bank is crossing into a new — and risky — era.

Since the onset of the financial crisis, the Fed generally has been reluctant to accept big risks. Though it took on some of the worst holdings from Bear Stearns Cos. and American International Group Inc., its other liquidity programs accepted only highly rated securities as collateral.

That changed Monday when the Treasury Department said the Fed would accept the toxic assets on bank balance sheets as collateral for loans under the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility. The shift could spell more risk for the Fed while further stripping it of the political independence that has made it a Washington powerhouse.

"The Fed is doing what a central bank should never do: take on many highly risky assets," said Allan Meltzer, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University and a noted Fed historian. "The Fed sacrificed its independence earlier in this crisis, so it did not have much more to give up."

The big question is whether those assets will end up on the Fed's balance sheet, and whether the central bank will ever be able to sell them.

"To the extent that there's no market for them, then we're going to be stuck with them until a market evolves," said Cornelius Hurley, a former Fed lawyer who is now the director of the Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law at the Boston University School of Law. "We're stepping into the shoes of the banks."

Others said the government needs to accept losses on assets if that is what it takes to salvage the financial system.

"I consider it a necessary evil," said Kevin Jacques, a former Treasury official who now chairs the finance department at Baldwin-Wallace College. "We may see some very risky assets ballooning on the Fed's balance sheet."

Under the program, the Fed lends against assets offered by banks as collateral. The assets, initially limited to securities backed by auto, credit card, student and small-business loans, stay on the bank's balance sheet unless the Fed decides to call the collateral.

The goal was originally to liquefy the markets for consumer debt by providing investors an incentive to buy the securities. Observers say the revamp complements the Treasury's larger plan by allowing banks to tap liquidity while holding on to assets they might not want to sell to the government.

"There are some banks that don't want to get them off the balance sheets and feel they're getting enough of a capital return," said Peter Vinella, the global head of financial services for the consulting firm LECG. The Fed and Treasury are "trying to create a program to cover the entire gambit."

Initially the facility accepted only collateral that was originated after Jan. 1 and received the highest ratings from their ratings firm. But the Treasury substantially weakened those provisions and said Monday that the holdings merely needed a triple-A rating at the time of origination, which could now include dates before this year.

"There are huge amounts" of securities that have been downgraded since origination, said Karen Shaw Petrou, the managing director of Federal Financial Analytics Inc. "Many of them are junk or below now."


Survey

Facebook's securities filings show its Facebook Credits digital currency business is exploding. Does it pose a serious threat to banks?

12%
32%
56%
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.