Quantcast
SEP 30, 2011 4:17pm ET

Web Seminars

The End of the Magstripe?
The State of EMV Smartcards in the U.S.
Available On Demand
10 Ways to Achieve Better IT Credibility…and Save Money | A Financial Services Case Study
Available On Demand
Executing Effective Validations in 2011 & Beyond
Available On Demand

HUD May Ban Executives with Outstanding FHA Obligations

Print
Reprints
Email

The HUD inspector general wants the Federal Housing Administration to ban corporate officers from the FHA program if they have left a company that has not met its obligations to indemnify the government for delinquent loans.

"We recommend that FHA seek legislative and program rule changes to prevent lenders and corporate officers with unsatisfied indemnification agreements from reentering the FHA program as the same or a new lender," according to a HUD Office of Inspector General report released Friday.

The OIG paper focuses on seven firms that had $7.3 million in outstanding indemnification obligations when their status as an FHA-approved lender was terminated.

OIG auditors found that 12 corporate officers of those firms were able to reenter the FHA program through another lender's shop -- or by starting a new company.

Four executives at First Magnus Financial Corp., Tucson, which closed in 2007 and eventually filed for bankruptcy, launched a new Arizona-based company -- Stone Water Mortgage -- in February 2008 that also made FHA-insured loans. When First Magnus failed FHA was left with 111 loans that had unresolved indemnification agreements. FHA incurred a $5.9 million loss on those loans. Stone Water closed in September 2009.

The HUD IG concludes that FHA needs new legal authority to prevent such corporate officials from reentering the FHA program.

FHA acting deputy assistant secretary Deborah Holston acknowledges that the agency cannot block such executives unless it can prove the individual is personally responsible for the loan losses.

In response to the OIG's findings, FHA is seeking a legal opinion from the HUD general counsel to see if new legislation can be enacted that does not require such a high standard of proof.

Under such a law, HUD would not have to prove any "knowledge or culpability" on the part of an individual being excluded from the FHA program, Holston says in a written response to the OIG report. Instead, FHA could determine that an individual was merely a corporate officer at the time and "committed a knowing and material violation of FHA requirements."

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.