New York Sees Bitcoin as a Catalyst for Modernizing Regulation

Print
Email
Reprints
Comment (1)
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

It's still unclear what New York's planned "BitLicense" actually is, but the New York Department of Financial Services says its license is meant to encourage Bitcoin businesses to operate and innovate in the state.

Bitcoin businesses include companies that exchange the digital currency for government-issued currency, store it in wallets that facilitate its use or help merchants accept payments. However, since Bitcoin wasn't created by a government, it has sometimes been seen as operating outside the law. Several state and national regulators have made moves to bring Bitcoin and other digital currencies under their oversight.

The New York department plans to create a BitLicense sometime in 2014, said Benjamin Lawsky, superintendent of the NYDFS, during the first in a series of hearings in Manhattan, but he also says he doesn't want to stifle the fledgling technology.

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency technology could force the traditional payment industry to innovate and make payments faster and less costly, says Lawsky. Digital currency could allow payments to take place as fast as sending an email, he says.

Fred Wilson, a principal partner at Union Square ventures, said during a panel discussion at the hearing that creating a safe harbor organization to allow Bitcoin startups a period to begin operating without all the proper state licenses would "encourage people to be compliant."

Bitcoin businesses could simply register with this organization to let the state know they are operating and working on obtaining proper state licenses, Wilson says.

The idea was echoed by several other panelists, including Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, and Lawsky seemed receptive to the idea. The Winkelvoss twins, who came to prominence through their lawsuit against Mark Zuckerberg over Facebook, are investors in the digital currency and businesses that handle it.

But Lawsky and other NYDFS panelists said just knowing they're operating isn't enough. Businesses in the safe harbor would still need to demonstrate a basic level of compliance.

Some of these Bitcoin startups are two-, three- or four-person teams, and "it's very hard for them to do what JPMorgan Chase does," says Wilson. "I think there needs to be an on-ramp to regulation that is inviting for young companies to embrace regulation."

Most panelists concluded that current regulation for money transmitters is sufficient for Bitcoin businesses. Further action should be light-handed so as not to stifle the innovation, they said.

The NYDFS "is cognizant of not imposing the same compliance costs" on big banks as on smaller community banks, so it understands the plight of Bitcoin startups being regulated under the same laws as big banks and money transmitters, Lawsky says. Lawsky has had to work with community banks that, as began hiring more compliance officers than loan officers - that practice won't work for newer businesses, he says.

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network issued guidance in March 2013 categorizing exchangers and administrators of virtual currency as money services businesses. Bitcoin businesses that fit into this model must register with Fincen and follow Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering rules. Those businesses must also obtain licenses in the states they operate in.

But these regulations were written a long time ago when things moved slower, Lawsky says, and the NYDFS is looking to modernize regulations for the digital age. The department has begun thinking about what reviews should look like and who it should employ, he says.

Lawsky wants the NYDFS to be the first in the nation to create a state regulatory framework for virtual currency firms.

Especially in light of this week's indictment of a Bitcoin Foundation director for alleged money laundering, "it's critically important to put up guard rails," says Lawsky.

Many of the investors on the panel say that the indictment of the director, Charlie Shrem, shows existing regulation is sufficient to allow law enforcement agencies to bring charges against suspects.

But while Bitcoin continues to be stained by its reputation as a currency for illicit activities, "I've seen a change in the character of people being involved in Bitcoin," says Jeremy Liew, partner at Lightspeed Ventures Partners, during the hearings. "The Bitcoin community is moving in the direction of greater legitimacy."

Lawsky also asked the panel how banks are reacting to Bitcoin.

"Banks are interested in doing business with Bitcoin [businesses] but are worried about the regulatory risks," Liew says.

Wilson says banks are starting to embrace Bitcoin. Big industries "accept new technology like the five stages of grief, and we're getting close to that acceptance stage," he says.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(1) Comment

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

'The Law Penalizes the Consumers It Set Out to Protect': Comments of the Week

American Banker readers share their views on the most pressing banking topics of the week. As excerpted from the Comments sections of AmericanBanker.com articles.

(Image: Fotolia)

Comments (1)
This man, Gordon Hilgers, usually reads articles quietly and rarely comments, but "modernization" of regulation? Seriously? Are you now advocating that, because bankers are so rich they should be allowed to become above the law and wreck the law the way Sara Palin shoots wild wolves in icy Alaska with a high-powered rifle from a government-supplied helicopter?

Wowza! You flunkies need 1) to wash your hair in the public bathroom at least twice a day; or 2) get down and let the government do what the government does: governs.

That means bankers and banks and corporations too. If I do not see nation-states around the world getting together to create an even-just-level playing field to stop the exploitation going on on the other side of the world, I have hopes and prayers that someone presses the button and sends the entire third stone from the sun right into the sun.

Your foolish "managed democracy" comedy routine is so transparent to people like myself that I am laughing at your dumbfounded foolishness: "Fascism is Capitalism in decline", said one Lenin, perhaps the only coherent statement he ever made. You are inside a double bear-trap, the Nazi-girlie-boys doing the dirty work, and then the so-called "ex-Soviet Union (it is underground, simply a name change and a MGMT type of country) and China will clean up the mess you are making of the planet.

Get a life. Quit screwing the poor of the world into the ground for luxury cars.

CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?
Posted by Gordon Hilgers | Wednesday, January 29 2014 at 2:40PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

The Most Influential Women in Payments

What does it take to lead in the still-mostly-male world of payments? This year's 20 Most Influential Women in Payments share stories about how they got to the top, their vision for the future of payments (hint: it's mainly mobile), and advice to other women working their way up the ladder.
DAILY ENEWSLETTER UPDATE

A Newsletter featuring Bank Technology News' top stories plus special reports and data

TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.