Quantcast

The S Corp Edge: It's Not Just Taxes

JUN 1, 2012 1:00am ET
Print
Email
Reprints
(4) Comments

It's more than just the tax advantages that boosts returns for investors in banks classified as S corporations—they appear to be fundamentally more profitable than their C corp counterparts.

The return on assets at the median S corp has consistently outdistanced the median for C corps by a wide margin over the past six years, even after adjusting earnings for S corps as though they paid corporate taxes, according to data from SNL Financial. In 2011, the median was 0.89 percent for S corps and 0.58 percent for C corps. (Unadjusted, the median for the S corps was 1.13 percent.)

The median return on equity for the S corps also consistently beat the median for C corps by a large gap, while median leverage, as measured by equity to assets ratios, was roughly on par between the two groups. (Institutions considered here had less than $500 million of assets at yearend and did not change their tax status between 2006 and 2011.)

S corps are entities with fewer than 100 shareholders that elect to pass their tax liabilities through to their owners, avoiding the double taxation of income that applies to ordinary C corps.

There is no reason that S corp status should translate into better fundamental performance, but perhaps smaller ownership groups tend to demand more from executives. Or perhaps executives at S corps are more likely to have big ownership stakes themselves.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(4) Comments

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

 

 
Best Performing Bank Stocks of 2012
The KBW Bank Index, a group ranging in size from JPMorgan Chase to the $21 billion-asset Commerce Bancshares, rocketed back in 2012, outperforming the S&P 500 Index and recovering much of the ground it lost the year before. The momentum came mostly from names like B of A and Citi, whose shares snapped back after steep losses the year before.

Change in market cap, year through Dec. 26: $237 billion

Total return, year through Dec. 26: 32.6%
Comments (4)
Maybe the fact that Sub S banks do not pay corporate taxes is the big reason why they are so successful. Hasn't that been the argument against credit unions - tax exemption?
Posted by no political hacks preferred | Friday, June 01 2012 at 2:49PM ET
Yes, but different than credit unions, SOMEONE pays taxes on the profits of S corporations, right? Kind of a red herring of an argument typically employed by CU policy hacks.
Posted by tcufrog | Monday, June 11 2012 at 3:04PM ET
Hacks,

Read the article. Adjusted for tax status, S-corps still outperform.
Posted by Tennebris | Friday, June 22 2012 at 5:18PM ET
I wonder if the analysis shows where in the P & L this is happening. If in HR costs, that would make sense. Owner/Employees might be incented to minimize returns in the form of payroll to avoid the related payroll taxes in the P & l and take returns as dividends or appreciation.

The last sentence makes the best hypothesis. You want more closely what you own personally.
Posted by mthompson | Tuesday, June 26 2012 at 2:09PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Marketplace
Fiserv is a leading global provider of information management and electronic commerce systems for the financial services industry.
Learn More
Informa Research Services is the premier provider of competitive intelligence, mystery shopping, and compliance testing services to the financial industry.
Learn More
CSC is a leader in private-label, third-party loan servicing with 30+ years of proven experience in delivering effective, cost-effective solutions.
Learn More
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.