I applaud Credit Union Journal’s

I did want to respond to the piece “
I had a different take-away from his response to a credit union organizing group, New Economy CU. The question was how can a newly chartered credit union expect to succeed when they are so often hamstrung for many years to come by very restrictive terms in the initial letters of understanding and agreement? These terms limit the ability of a new credit union to lend (often to less than $5,000) which in turn limits its ability to build a strong and viable business. This unfortunately has been the state of affairs for decades and has caused the anemic performance of so many promising new start-ups.
When the chairman said “
I see this as an opening for a better business model for newly chartered CUs, one with the ability to have diversified lending with the opportunity to serve multiple needs within their communities while generating sufficient revenue to fuel their growth in a responsible manner. In fact, this and other responses evoked the possibility of a new day at NCUA in which CU leaders are able to lead their institutions, and examiners and auditors are expected to do just that, examine and audit and no longer attempt to impact or unduly influence the business of the credit union.
We look forward to advancing this goal with NCUA and hope to see more robust and lasting institutions to receive charters and continue to reach and serve new and underserved communities.