Lenders praised a proposed Federal Reserve Board staff  commentary, saying it would protect them from consumer lawyers looking for   technical violations of the Truth-in-Lending Act.   
The rule interpretation allows lenders to consolidate various fees,  rather than listing each one separately. Lawyers have sued lenders for   failing to record particular charges.   
  
"This proposed revision is urgently needed, and will better reflect the  realities of the marketplace and reduce costly litigation based on overly   hypertechnical disclosure requirements," wrote Sidney E. Morrison, general   counsel to the Independent Finance Association of Illinois.     
Consumer lawyer Daniel A. Edelman said the Fed should limit its  commentary to fees that apply equally to all borrowers. Abuses occur when   lenders try to charge individual customers different fees for the same   service, he said. Lumping the fees together would prevent consumers from   discovering potential wrongdoing, he said.       
  
Comments were due Feb. 2 on the commentary, which also addresses high-  cost and reverse mortgages. 
Kenneth A. Guenther, executive vice president of the Independent Bankers  Association of America, wrote that use of the Department of Housing and   Urban Development's reverse mortgage disclosure software should give banks   a safe harbor from prosecution by the Fed.