Consumers made transactions worth 8 billion yuan (US$1.7 billion or 905.2 million euros) using China's migrant workers debit cards as of 31 Dec., up 139.5% from 3.34 billion yuan as of the end of 2007, a spokesperson for China UnionPay, the payment card network that helps administer the program, tells CardLine Global. The People's Bank of China established the service in 2005 to enable migrant workers to deposit funds in bank accounts in cities where the migrants work. Accountholders can withdraw funds from rural credit cooperatives near their homes. Some 164 banks in China offer the service, which was expanded to Tibet last month, the spokesperson says. Workers using the service pay fees equal to 0.8% of the transaction amount. China has approximately 140 million migrant workers, Zhang Hua, a China-based banking analyst for United States-based Celent LLC, tells CardLine Global. Other card schemes charge transaction fees not much higher than what the migrant worker program charges, and this will make it difficult for the program to gain market dominance, he adds.
-
The volume of bankruptcy filings has been climbing, particularly among small businesses. But analysts note that the numbers are still below pre-pandemic levels.
5h ago -
In pitting AI agents against historic 60-40 portfolio results, JPMorgan found AI won every time. But researchers could not rule out the possibility that the systems could have essentially cheated.
10h ago -
The Honolulu-based company said it plans to acquire TriCo Bancshares in Chico, California, and retain all of the seller's 68 branches.
July 13 -
The card network may sell a London-based processing subsidiary, reportedly amid government pressure on U.S. payments domination in local markets.
July 13 -
A group of 24 state-focused advocacy groups are banding together to form a national coalition to fight against industry lobbies as a federal EWA law threatens states' regulatory independence. Opponents of EWA say it resembles payday lending.
July 13 -
The HR software is used by scores of U.S. banks, including many of the largest ones. The case also raises broader questions about job candidate screening and who is liable when an AI tool causes disparate impact.
July 13










