Exclusive research

Big banks are leading the on-chain and stablecoin race

American Banker's 2026 Value of On-Chain Survey

On-chain technology, the distributed ledger tech on which products like digital assets and tokenized deposits are recorded, is the next technology frontier banks are racing to reach according to new American Banker research.

American Banker’s 2026 Value of On-Chain survey was fielded online during February of 2026 among 199 banking professionals who work across a variety of roles at banks, credit unions, online-only divisions of traditional banks and unchartered neobanks.

Top findings from the report
Results from the report are highlighted below using interactive charts. Mouse over each section for more detail, click on the chart labels to show or hide sections and use the arrows to cycle between chart views.

This item is the start of a series diving into new research from American Banker. Click the links below to read the other parts of the overall research.

Processing Content

Where are banks and credit unions in the on-chain tech race?

Key takeaway: The largest banks are the biggest users of on-chain technology, while others are still in the early stages of planning.

Banks and credit unions alike are off to the on-chain races, but it's mostly the big players at the front of the pack for now.

About 30% have already implemented or are piloting on-chain technology, while 15% are in early discussions about how to use the technology without the aid of outside partners.

At least a quarter (25%) of national banks are currently unsure about plans for adopting and integrating on-chain technology. 

Regional bankers had the largest share of respondents (43%) currently in the discussion phase of on-chain technology adoption. Only 15% of bankers said they already implemented on-chain technology or are in the piloting phase.

The majority of community bankers (54%) haven't discussed using on-chain technology, with a separate 25% saying they are in the early talking stages about on-chain adoption without outside help. Credit unions had a similar distribution of responses, with 44% saying no discussions have taken place and 24% saying their organizations are talking about how to use the technology without partners.

Save for the largest institutions, most banks and credit unions are still hashing out what an on-chain technology adoption plan could look like. This is in part due to an evolving regulatory landscape surrounding the industry, as well as the costs associated with building the framework for supporting these tools.

Since the start of this year, JPMorganChase has been working to broaden the stance of its blockchain unit known as Kinexys. Kara Kennedy, global co-head of the bank's blockchain unit and overseer of Kinexys Digital Assets, told American Banker that the bank recently conducted pilots for uses such as tokenizing traditional assets as collateral in B2B financing and securities.

This effort builds off progress from late last year, when the bank launched My Onchain Net Yield Fund for the publicly-available Ethereum blockchain. MONY is a private placement fund allowing investors to earn U.S. dollar yields through a subscription with Morgan Money, which is the bank's open architecture trading and analytics platform for liquidity management.

"This is enabling our next phase, which is to be active in public blockchains," Kennedy said.

What are the top on-chain use cases for banks, credit unions?

Key takeaway: Cross-border payments are the leading use case for on-chain technology facing individual consumers.

Cross-border payments, digital asset custodianship and loyalty programs are all top use cases for consumer-facing on-chain technology products that are either in use now or on the horizon.

For individual consumer products, cross-border payments and remittances (43%) was the top on-chain technology use case either currently enabled, piloted or planned to launch within the next 12 months. 

Loyalty programs and programmable payments or smart contracts were close behind, at 33%, followed by custodianship of public digital assets (30%) and tokenization of deposits (30%). Exchange services was the capability that more than half of respondents (53%) said were not being discussed, decided not to offer or were unsure about.

Payments are just one use case for on-chain technology. There's been a recent surge in interest following the growth in popularity of stablecoins and other digital assets.

In September of last year, the Singapore-based technology giant Ant International finalized its first nearly instant U.S. dollar-to-euro-foreign exchange payment in Asia through JPMorganChase's blockchain unit Kinexys. The transaction was done by integrating Kinexys Digital Payments into Ant's blockchain treasury management platform Whale.

"Near-instant on-chain FX cross-border payments through Kinexys Digital Payments provide businesses with uninterrupted access to liquidity across selected global currencies, enabling them to conduct transactions outside of designated market hours and beyond the limitations of traditional market cutoff times," a JPMorganChase spokesperson told American Banker in an email.

How on-chain technology is being used for business clients

Key takeaway: Cross-border functionality is a high priority for on-chain technology use cases facing business clients.

Payments and blockchain-based trade finance are hotbeds for on-chain use cases among financial institutions.

For business clients, cross-border payment rails (41%) was the top on-chain technology use case currently enabled, piloted or planned for launch within the next 12 months.

Payout and disbursement rails (37%), merchant payments (34%), wholesale payments (34%) and tokenization of deposits (30%) were other top use cases for business clients. Reserve management was the capability that more than half of respondents (60%) said was not being discussed, decided not to offer or were unsure about.

Cross-border payments is an important area for business clients that either already do business abroad or are seeking to do so, especially as the Trump administration's attitude towards tariffs remains volatile.

In speaking at last year's American Banker Small Business Banking conference in October, Vlatka Puljic, managing director of US Business Banking Revenue Initiatives and Product Partnerships at BMO, said "integration is key" for any bank or credit union thinking of offering cross-border products. "Customers tell us they don't want to log into multiple platforms, they want one platform for their deposit account, their loan, their TMS and their cross-border payments," Puljic said. "They want it all to be seamless because they wear a lot of hats and don't have much time [and] they want full visibility. It's about providing that service as opposed to a one-off product."

Which institutions are looking to issue a stablecoin of their own?

Key takeaway: National banks were most eager to issue stablecoins, while community banks and credit unions were the least likely.

National bankers are the most likely candidates for issuing publicly-accessible stablecoins within the next 10 years.

More than half (54%) of national bank respondents expect their bank to issue a publicly-accessible stablecoin within the next 10 years, while 41% said it wasn't likely and 5% were unsure of their institution's path forward with issuing a stablecoin.

Midsize and regional banks were more evenly distributed in their plans for stablecoin issuance. Roughly 40% of respondents expect to issue a stablecoin, while 45% don't and 15% were unsure.

Community banks and credit unions were the group mostly opposed to issuing stablecoins, with only 31% planning to do so in the next 10 years and 58% planning not to. Ten percent were unsure.

Regulators continue to iron out a possible regulatory framework for stablecoin issuers, with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency proposing an outline for capital and other requirements for payment stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act last month.

The proposal drills down on licensing, operational and reserve requirements, governance, transparency, risk management and capital adequacy, all with the aim of furthering innovation in the space under the watchful purview of the federal government.

"The OCC has given thoughtful consideration to a proposed regulatory framework in which the stablecoin industry can flourish in a safe and sound manner," said Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan V. Gould.

In the wake of these developments, Mastercard announced plans to purchase stablecoin tech development firm BVNK for roughly $1.8 billion, which includes $300 million in contingent payments. The acquisition is part of the card network's broader play to establish a stablecoin network which features other efforts like the Mastercard Crypto Partner Program.

The acquisition will see BVNK integrate its tools into Mastercard's network spanning over 200 countries and featuring existing partnerships with banks, payment processors, fintechs, acquirers, and issuers.

"This partnership matters far beyond BVNK and Mastercard. … It signals a fundamental shift: stablecoins are no longer an experiment, they're becoming the base layer for how the world moves money," Jesse Hemson Struthers, chief executive and co-founder of BVNK, said in a post on the firm's site.


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Payments Stablecoin Cross border payments Market Intelligence Editorial Research
MORE FROM AMERICAN BANKER