Big-Bank Critics Raise 'Legitimate' Questions: JPM Alum Heidi Miller

Print
Email
Reprints
Comment (1)
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+
Partner Insights

Critics of big banks have raised "a legitimate question" of whether the marriage of commercial and investment banking is too unwieldy, a former JPMorgan Chase (JPM) executive said Wednesday night.

Heidi Miller, who retired as head of JPMorgan's international businesses in February after an executive shake-up last year, defended the utility of large, diversified financial services companies — and criticized the industry for not doing a better job of defending itself. Yet she acknowledged that some companies run the risk of becoming too big.

The big banks haven't answered the question of "at what point does scale also breed diseconomy, or diseconomies of [being] too large. So that's a legitimate question and I don't think the banks have actually answered it well," Miller said in an interview after a panel discussion in New York City.

JPMorgan Chase is currently the country's largest bank by assets, and Miller's former boss, Chief Executive Jamie Dimon, has been one of the most vocal defenders of the megabanks. He and other bankers have argued that the biggest banks, with both investment and commercial arms, are the only companies that can provide sophisticated financial services to a wide range of business and government customers, including big loans, global cash management and deal advice.

Miller agreed with that argument on Wednesday — to a point.

"The premise of putting …businesses together to get leverage and synergies across those businesses actually bears out," she added. "Whether we've passed that in terms of absolute size, we haven't argued well enough for me to answer, at least positively, that it's a diseconomy."

Miller cited some of the industry's arguments that the big banks can offer diversified, all-in-one services that smaller commercial or investment banks can't handle with the same efficiency. But banks need to get better at making that case, she said.

"The largest banks have done themselves a disservice by not making it clear what the benefits are from their many diversifications, across different businesses that naturally use certain systems, whether it's a market that uses a branch, asset management that uses client services or investment banking that uses custodial services," Miller said.

"I don't think we've made that as clear an argument &mdasb; the largest banks have not made that as clear as they can," she added.

The debate over banks' size and diverse businesses was revived this summer by former Citigroup (NYSE: C) CEO Sandy Weill, who is credited and blamed with creating the modern megabank at Citi. After the financial crisis destroyed or hobbled many big banks, bringing Citi to the brink of failure and forcing it to drastically cut back its size and operations, Weill this summer threw his support behind the idea of separating commercial and investment banking.

Miller, who worked for Weill at Travelers Group and Citi, was not very impressed Wednesday with his change of heart.

"Sandy's confusing two things. He's confusing his bad management decisions from an underlying strategy," she said.

Miller, who last year accepted a lifetime achievement award as one of American Banker's most powerful women in banking, spoke Wednesday on a panel about women and Wall Street that was hosted by the New America Foundation.

Her remarks about big banks were less stinging than those of Sallie Krawcheck, a former chief financial officer at Citigroup and global head of wealth management at Bank of America (BAC), in the June issue of the Harvard Business Review. Large banks are still too complex and still too prone to take undue risks, Krawcheck wrote in an op-ed, which also recommended several reforms to pay and governance.

"Boards need simple and commonsense — but powerful — tools to cut through the complexity and push management behavior in the direction of responsible risk taking," she wrote.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(1) Comment

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

'Dodd-Frank Is Like the TSA': Comments of the Week
American Banker readers share their views on the most pressing banking topics of the week. Comments are excerpted from reader response sections of AmericanBanker.com articles and from our social media platforms.

(Image: iStock)

Comments (1)
The hoped for synergies have rarely materialized to the extent that they justified megabank mergers. They paid off-directly for the CEOs involved, and indirectly for shareholders due to their greater political protection and hence ability to take greater risks.
Posted by kvillani | Friday, September 21 2012 at 10:52AM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

  LinkedIn

Women in Banking — American Banker: American Banker invites women executives across the banking and financial services industry to connect with one another, share news and best practices, and keep up with our Mentor Factor and Most Powerful Women in Banking initiatives.

Join our mailing list »

Our weekly eNewsletter contains timely and relevant news about women in banking across the web. Sign up for this must-read digest today.

Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.