Quantcast
BTN
FEB 1, 2012 12:04pm ET

Web Seminars

5 Reasons why Automated IT is becoming the new standard
for Financial Institutions
Available On Demand
10 Ways to Achieve Better IT Credibility…and Save Money | A Financial Services Case Study
Available On Demand
Is there Money in the Mobile Wallet?: Business Models and Prospects for Mobile Payments in the U.S.
Available On Demand

South African Banks Declare War on Money Management Site

Print
Reprints
Email

Much of the original animus that banks expressed when third-party account aggregators, such as Mint.com and Yodlee, emerged in the U.S. has faded as banks have embraced the personal financial management (PFM) model. In many cases U.S. banks are now actually teaming with independent providers to offer the tools to customers.

But there's no such conciliation in South Africa, where banks are baring their fangs to combat a new money management site called 22seven.

A pair of that country's largest banks, First National Bank and Absa are issuing statements that suggest the third party PFM site is unsafe by making a veiled link between the broad dangers of personal disclosure online to the analysis of financial behavior offered by 22seven.

On a First National Bank blog that includes references to phishing, the bank says its "warning comes as third party sites seeking a customers' personal details claim to offer value added benefits to the customer." In the case of Absa, the warning also comes as the bank says it's developing a PFM service of its own: "Aside from these serious security concerns, customers should also note that forthcoming redevelopments to Absa's online banking platforms, set for release later in 2012, will include a variety of personal financial management tools."

In the U.S., PFM sites tout security protocols that are equal to that provided by banks, and point out the "read only" status of the sites, which doesn't allow for actual transactions.

Shawn Ward, CEO and co-founder of Geezeo, says most PFMs endorsed by a bank now offer an authenticated single sign-on connection from their online banking platform. "Using Geezeo as an example, we leverage a SAML2.0 based single sign-on connection that originates inside the users 'logged in' online banking session. There is no user name or password for a user to enter, or for a 'hacker' to steal. The authentication risk has shifted from a more easily compromised user generated/tracked password system to a more systematic, highly monitored, authenticated connection," he says.

A spokesperson for Yodlee, which is providing the technology for 22seven, said the firm is providing the same technology protection that it provides to banks elsewhere. In a statement, 22seven also said it's a "read only" service, which means it gathers information from accounts, but doesn't allow transfers or transactions. Communications between users' PCs or mobile devices is encrypted using a 256-bit extended validation SSL certificate, which is designed to ensure that information flowing between users and the firm can't be deciphered by external parties.

"It is interesting to note that initial reaction of U.S. banks quickly turned from hostile to engaging with independent aggregators," says Christo Davel, CEO of 22seven, who then took an indirect swipe of his own at the South African banks. "The majority of the largest U.S. banks now have direct data feeds to established aggregators. I believe the more innovative South African banks will do the same in the future."

Founded by Davel, 22seven collects financial data from South African bank accounts. While the site is still in beta, its strategy uses gamification to make the interface more user friendly and behavioral science to produce a graphic-heavy interface that aids in personal financial decision-making.

Comments (1)
I'm not sure these campaigns will work to deter consumers from using PFM. The big lesson from the early days of PFM is: consumers don't care about security (or at least, they don't care as much as we think they should). Wesabe went out of its way to address security concerns, initially refusing to store passwords, and this strategy unfortunately held it back. Then again, Rudder had a breach in 2009 and shut down its service a year later, so perhaps security just isn't an issue until it fails. --Daniel Wolfe, Risk/Technology Editor, American Banker
Posted by dwolfe | Wednesday, February 01 2012 at 12:53PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.