JPMorgan to Pay $100 Million to Settle CFTC London Whale Claims
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) agreed to pay $100 million to resolve Commodity Futures Trading Commission claims that the companys London traders last year deployed a reckless strategy in derivatives.
The accord, which stems from the banks chief investment offices conduct on Feb. 29, 2012, brings JPMorgans settlements from the London Whale trades to more than $1 billion, the CFTC said today in a statement.
JPMorgans traders tried to defend their position in credit derivatives by dumping a gargantuan, record-setting, volume of swaps virtually all at once, recklessly ignoring the obvious dangers to legitimate pricing forces, David Meister, the CFTCs head of enforcement, said in the statement.
The New York-based bank agreed in September to pay $920 million to resolve related U.S. and U.K. probes into its internal controls and handling of the trades, which inflicted at least $6.2 billion in losses on the bank last year. The accords dont end all of the investigations into the bets managed by Bruno Iksil, the trader known as the London Whale because his positions were large enough to move markets.
The settlement following the agencys 17-month investigation relies on Dodd-Frank Act powers to combat market manipulation. The 2010 financial-regulatory law broadened the agencys ability to bring enforcement cases, allowing lawyers to demonstrate reckless trading instead of intent to manipulate.
On Feb. 29, 2012, JPMorgan traders tried to defend their position in credit-default swaps to stem losses, according to the CFTC. The bank sold more than $7 billion of swaps that day, including $4.6 billion in a three-hour period, the agency said. The sales accounted for more than 90 percent of the days net volume traded by the entire market, the agency said.
The selling was a manipulative device that disregarded consequences to the broader market, the CFTC said.
Joe Evangelisti, a spokesman for JPMorgan, said the bank neither admitted nor denied the CFTCs legal conclusion that there was a violation, while admitting to certain facts set out in the order.
I would not have supported the Order unless JPMorgan had admitted to such findings of fact, Bart Chilton, a Democratic CFTC commissioner, said in a separate statement.
Scott OMalia, a Republican commissioner, dissented from the decision and said the agency should have taken more time to demonstrate whether the bank is liable for price manipulation.
The commissions abbreviated investigation has failed to determine whether JPMorgan intentionally or recklessly manipulated the price of a particular type of credit default swap index, OMalia said in his statement.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has said its inquiry remains open while the U.S. Justice Department runs a parallel probe. Iksil, who prosecutors have said is cooperating with their case, hasnt been charged.
In April last year, JPMorgan Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon initially dismissed reports that the derivatives bets were distorting markets, calling the attention a tempest in a teapot. The bank disclosed mounting losses a month later.
The bank admitted in its SEC settlement that internal oversight of the trades suffered from lapses and that the firm violated federal securities laws. The companys handling of the trades also has been faulted by Senate investigators, the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Reserve and U.K. Financial Conduct Authority.
JPMorgan has sought in the past few months to resolve probes into businesses including energy trading, credit-card lending and bundling of mortgages into bonds. The bank said Oct. 11 it took a $7.2 billion charge for expenses tied to regulatory matters and litigation, leading to its first quarterly loss during Dimons tenure.
The company has yet to resolve state and federal probes into its mortgage-bond sales, including a criminal inquiry. JPMorgan has been discussing a potential $11 billion deal with authorities looking into that business, a person with knowledge of the talks said in September.