Letter to the Editor: End the CU Free Lunch

To the Editor:

It was interesting to note that Sen. Charles Schumer is proposing to introduce legislation that would remove the statutory limit, presently at 12.25%, on the volume of business loans that can be made by credit unions ["CU Small-Business Effort Wins Schumer's Backing," March 10].

While the differences that used to distinguish credit unions from banks and thrift institutions are now almost non-existent, Sen. Schumer is losing sight of a key issue — credit unions enjoy an exemption from federal income taxes, whereas the banks, thrift institutions and other industries do not.

Hence, the logical question has to be asked: Why grant expanded powers to an industry (i.e., the credit unions) that wants to have the same commercial lending powers as banks and thrift institutions but wants to continue a free lunch by not having to pay federal income taxes?

Since Sen. Schumer's proposed legislation is likely to enable a credit union to realize increased earnings as the result of expanded commercial lending, wouldn't it be logical to expect the credit union to pay a portion of its enhanced earnings to the Treasury Department?

At a time when the Treasury Department is grasping to find ways to cut the federal budget deficit, why is Sen. Schumer allowing a costly free lunch to continue?

Sen. Schumer is grossly in error by asserting that there are "so many large banks in bad shape." He should take a look in the backyard in the credit union industry, which has its own share of financial problems. In Florida, two troubled credit unions agreed to merge, creating a behemoth with $7.8 billion in assets. In Wisconsin, the state regulator had to place one credit union in receivership, and in Montana, one credit union reported a yearend loss of $4.8 million, which prompted its merger into another credit union.

The members of the Senate and the House should demand an end to the free lunch days for the credit unions. At a time when many businesses in this country are struggling just to survive, it makes no sense to let a huge industry, such as the credit unions, have expanded powers without paying federal income taxes.Barry J. Zadworny
Senior vice president, compliance
Roma Bank, Robbinsville, N.J.

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Community banking
MORE FROM AMERICAN BANKER