NYDFS extends BNPL request for information deadline to Sept. 15

Angus Mordant/Bloomberg

UPDATE: This article includes the extended deadline for buy now/pay later providers to submit comments to the New York Department of Financial Services' request for information, as well as comments from American Fintech Council CEO Phil Goldfeder in response to the extension.

New York state's financial regulator has extended the deadline for responses to the request for information related to the buy now/pay later industry it issued last month following an industry trade group's request for additional time.

New York established a licensing and oversight framework for the buy now/pay later industry in May with new legislation attached to its 2026 budget, marking the first time a state law specifically targeted BNPL loans for licensing obligations, according to a Mayer Brown bulletin. 

As part of the rulemaking process, the NYDFS on July 31 issued a voluntary request for information with an original deadline of Aug. 31. "DFS's goal in issuing this RFI is to understand the business models of entities offering BNPL products, fee structures of those products, the underwriting process, and the impact that fee and interest limits may have on BNPL product underwriting and business more generally, among other topics," the DFS wrote in a letter. 

That deadline has since been extended to Sept. 15, a spokesperson from the DFS office confirmed with American Banker. The extension falls short of the 30-day extension requested by the American Fintech Council in a letter sent to DFS Superintendent Adrienne Harris on Friday.

"We appreciate Superintendent Harris and the New York Department of Financial Services extending the deadline for its BNPL RFI. This additional time will help responsible providers deliver the most complete and accurate information possible," Phil Goldfeder, AFC's CEO, told American Banker. "AFC and our members remain committed to engaging constructively with DFS to ensure any regulatory framework supports consumer protection while preserving access to safe, affordable, and innovative BNPL products."

Goldfeder said he did not know how many of AFC's member companies would be participating in the RFI. 

The NY BNPL Act defines a BNPL loan as an extension of closed-end credit provided to a New York resident in connection with the purchase of goods or services, regardless of whether the loan charges interest or a finance charge. Loans repayable in one or more installments are included, essentially putting all major BNPL providers under its oversight. Motor vehicle purchases are not included in the state's NY BNPL law.

NYDFS' request for information is thorough and the timeline was tight, Eamonn Moran, a partner at Holland & Knight, told American Banker. 

"It seems clear that the data requested by NYDFS requires significant time to collect, compile, and transmit, especially as NYDFS specifically requests for respondents to be 'as specific as possible in their responses' and to include 'data and relevant materials wherever possible,'" Moran said.

The DFS requested information about the business models of BNPL companies, fee structures of their products, and information about companies' underwriting processes, as well as information about how limits on fees and interest limits would affect BNPL underwriting and the wider business, Moran said. 

The Financial Technology Association, another industry group that represents BNPL providers, also supports a 30-day extension to the RFI, CEO Penny Lee told American Banker in an email. 

"We appreciate NYDFS's focus on data-driven policy and are committed to providing accurate responses to inform their rulemaking. However, given the breadth and depth of the Department's questions, we would support a 30-day extension of the deadline," Lee said. 

"Our members support rules for BNPL products that are both appropriate and activity-based, protecting consumers while preserving access to low-cost, transparent BNPL options," Lee said. "Unfortunately, some of the provisions included in the final bill are ill-suited for a BNPL product, and we hope they will be addressed either through rulemaking or further legislation."

BNPL providers will ultimately have to weigh whether to provide DFS with the data, Holland & Knights' Moran said.

"Entities … will first have to face the issue of whether to respond, and evaluate any risks for not doing so, especially if they are entities whose activities may be covered by the BNPL Act and their data could be of great value for NYDFS in crafting the BNPL regulatory regime," Moran said. 

Providers will also have to contend with providing information they may view as commercially sensitive or trade secrets, he said. 

"Receiving the most accurate and comprehensive data possible would be helpful for all parties involved (and the data received would appear to be mission critical for NYDFS to ensure that the collected data is well-suited to inform its forthcoming BNPL regulatory activities)," Moran said. "But compiling and submitting this data in the short window provided by NYDFS risks having deficiencies in either its accuracy or completeness."