= Subscriber content; or subscribe now to access all American Banker content.

Warren Sharply Criticizes Fed Staff Over Dodd-Frank Views

WASHINGTON — Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen found herself on the defensive Tuesday as Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., cast doubt on a top staff member of the Fed, suggesting he was not committed to implementing the Dodd-Frank Act.

During an unusually aggressive bout of questioning for Yellen, particularly from a lawmaker generally regarded as supportive of the Fed chair, Warren questioned comments made by Fed General Counsel Scott Alvarez last year raising concerns with aspects of the financial reform law.

"The Fed is our first line of defense against another financial crisis, and the Fed's general counsel, or anyone at the Fed staff, should not be picking and choosing which rules to enforce based on their personal views," Warren said during a Senate Banking Committee hearing, the first of two this week in which Yellen will testify on monetary policy matters.

"I urge you to carefully review this issue and to assess whether the leadership of the Fed staff is on the same page as the Federal Reserve Board."

At issue were remarks Alvarez made in November to the American Bar Association in which he criticized a provision of Dodd-Frank that forced banks to push out certain swap activities into affiliates.

"You can tell it was written at 2:30 in the morning," Alvarez said, according to Warren. "And so it needs to be, I think, revised just to make sense of it."

A month later, the swaps provision was mostly repealed when large banks successfully added a provision to a must-pass spending bill. That incident angered Warren and other progressives, who said it was the equivalent of "blowing a hole in" the Dodd-Frank Act.

Alvarez also reportedly criticized a separate provision meant to address conflicts of interest at credit rating agencies, suggesting it didn't work as intended.

During the hearing, Warren repeatedly asked whether Yellen agreed with Alvarez's views.

"Do these specific criticisms of Dodd-Frank rules that govern the largest institutions in this country … reflect your criticisms or the criticisms of the Fed board?" Warren asked.

Yellen did not offer a defense of Alvarez or Fed staff in general, instead emphasizing that Dodd-Frank is a "very important piece of legislation that has provided a roadmap for us to put in place regulation."

The response did not satisfy Warren, who said, "I just need a yes or no here: do his criticisms reflect your criticisms?"

Yellen eventually agreed that neither she nor the Fed were as openly critical of the swaps push-out rule as Alvarez had apparently been.

"The Fed's position and my position is that we're able to work very constructively within the framework of Dodd-Frank to tailor rules that are appropriate for the institutions we supervise, and we're not seeking to change the rules," she said.

The exchange was notable for several reasons, including Warren's ongoing ire at those who would significantly change Dodd-Frank. It also is unusual for a lawmaker to so publicly criticize a staff member of the Fed, and for doubts about that member to go unaddressed by the head of the central bank.

After the hearing, Yellen expressed faith in Alvarez in a written statement.

"My colleagues and I depend, with confidence, on Scott Alvarez' expert advice and counsel," Yellen said. "He is a dedicated public servant who is committed to thoughtful public policy."

Warren was also one of Yellen's champions during the lead-up to her confirmation last year. Yet the Massachusetts Democrat has raised concerns about the Fed's independence from big-bank influence.

She took New York Fed President William Dudley to task late last year over allegations that the regional bank supervisor responsible for overseeing the largest banks had been "captured" by those institutions and was unable or unwilling to vigorously enforce the law.

Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., returned to that subject again on Tuesday, asking what changes Yellen is making to ensure "greater accountability for the New York Fed."

Yellen responded that the Fed is reviewing its large-bank supervision program, the results of which are due soon.

Dennis Kelleher, president of the public interest group Better Markets, said that Warren was giving voice to a concern that has been growing in recent years over the power that career staff have in crafting regulatory policy at the Fed, which lacks some of the transparency and accountability measures present at other federal agencies. Alvarez in particular, Kelleher said, has a very influential role at the Fed.

"It is impossible to overstate the enormous influence and power of the Fed's senior staff," Kelleher said. "Alvarez is often referred to as the 'eighth governor' [of the Fed board]. He is literally at the juncture of every significant policy decision made by the Fed because they all have to go through legal."

Kelleher said the solution he advocates is to increase transparency at the Fed so that staff decisions and actions are more clearly delineated and documented. That interest is increasingly shared by Republicans and Democrats alike, Kelleher said, and he expects that a coalition could craft legislation or otherwise apply pressure necessary to open op the Fed's traditionally opaque processes.


(5) Comments



Comments (5)
This is what you get when you have someone in Congress with no real work experience. This is USA, not the Peoples Republic of Progressives (ie, socialists).
Posted by tonada1962 | Friday, February 27 2015 at 5:01PM ET
"The Fed is our first line of defense against another financial crisis, and the Fed's general counsel, or anyone at the Fed staff, should not be picking and choosing which rules to enforce based on their personal views," Warren said during a Senate Banking Committee hearing...

Am I seriously reading this. This is exactly what her president does every day with laws he doesn't like. The height of hypocrisy.
Posted by Amaulsby | Thursday, February 26 2015 at 1:29PM ET
Warren is a complete idiot. Don't ever think you will be able to understand her. She also is a hypocrite.
Posted by bigdog1 | Wednesday, February 25 2015 at 12:14PM ET
Alvarez' comment about this behemoth legislation being written at 2:30 in the morning was mild, and accurate. (He could also have said that it was read, much less understood, by virtually no one before it was passed into law.)

Warren continues to alienate official Washington, and responsible lawmakers.
Posted by GMahler | Wednesday, February 25 2015 at 10:08AM ET
Senator Warren ought to get over it and quit trying to defend the indefensible overkill in Dodd-Frank and the resultant barrage of costly and often useless regulation.
Posted by Incredulous | Tuesday, February 24 2015 at 9:22PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.